Jun 11 2008
Barrack Obama strongly supports infanticide
In a speech to Planned Parenthood members, Barrack Obama stated that his first act as president would be signing the “Freedom of Choice Act.”
What is the Freedom of Choice Act? It is a law that would not permit any federal, state or local agency to prevent any woman from obtaining an abortion, despite the stage of pregnancy, for any reason.
The bill reads in part:
(a) Statement of Policy- It is the policy of the United States that every woman has the fundamental right to choose to bear a child, to terminate a pregnancy prior to fetal viability, or to terminate a pregnancy after fetal viability when necessary to protect the life or health of the woman.
(b) Prohibition of Interference- A government may not–
0. (1) deny or interfere with a woman’s right to choose–
. (A) to bear a child;
. (B) to terminate a pregnancy prior to viability; or
. (C) to terminate a pregnancy after viability where termination is necessary to protect the life or health of the woman; or
0. (2) discriminate against the exercise of the rights set forth in paragraph (1) in the regulation or provision of benefits, facilities, services, or information.
(c) Civil Action- An individual aggrieved by a violation of this section may obtain appropriate relief (including relief against a government) in a civil action.
Abortion is a controversial topic in this country. It will continue to be. However, despite the differences it seems to me there would be some basics that both sides could agree to, such as the fact that partial birth abortion is murder and should be outlawed under any and all circumstances.
What purpose does it serve to kill a baby that is no longer in utero, and has been purposely delivered in the breach position except for the head –which has a sharp pair of scissors driven into it’s brain in order to achieve death, and if the scissors do not work a vacuum in inserted into the hole and the brain sucked out.
I challenge my readers to watch the following video and cite for me one example of how murdering a viable baby via birth abortion has saved the life of the mother. I challenge any of my readers to cite for me one example of how murdering a viable baby protected the health of a mother.
It is especially shameful that Barrack Obama would continue to support this billion dollar industry, especially knowing it was created in part for the purpose of destroying the black community. Lifenews.com reported “A new poll released by the Pew Research foundation finds that less than half of African Americans believe life will get better for them. Dr. Alveda King, the niece of the late Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., says that hopelessness found in the black community is because of how abortion is adversely affecting it.
King told LifeNews.com the hopelessness documented in the poll is linked in part to the high abortion rate in the black community. “Children are the future. When you destroy your children, you destroy hope,” Dr. King said.”
Even Louis Farrakhan, Obama’s good friend gets it. In a 1992 article in USA Today, he once described Roe v Wade as the “opening shot” in a war to destroy blacks in America.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uA_xgewCLCE
How about a mother who is 26 weeks pregant diagnosed with cancer that will kill her if she doesn’t receive immediate chemo? Many women, as the media has shown, choose their baby’s life over their own but that shouldn’t be up to some law to decide. The woman should have the right to choose whether she values her life over that of her unborn child - and what if she already has children who would be left without a mother if she chose the baby’s life over hers?
I don’t completely agree with the Act as it stands, but with some modification so that there is a measure of accountability in the terms of viable pregnancy it’s not such a bad thing.
Hi Katianne. Thank you for being here.
Now, can you please cite for me one example of a mother that had a partial birth abortion at 26 weeks in order to receive treatment for chemo, or is this a hypothetical?
That being said, a baby born at 26 weeks has a 50% survival rate, and as medical advances continue that increases.
Off the top of my head, I can’t remember the cases, but I can think of at least 2 cases that hit the media in the past 10 years and in each case the mother opted to save the baby - in one case the mother died and was kept on life support until the baby was born. I have neuro-related memory issues so I can’t give dates.
The thing is that it’s not outside the realms of possibility. I think the UK government recently turned down an amendment to the abortion act because of advances in technology meaning that premature babies have a greater chance of survival from an earlier age. I don’t know why it was turned down, but I’m sure it was. That memory thing again - man if it’s this bad now, what’s gonna be like when I’m REALLY old! LOL
Katieanne, the question is not early delivery. The question is why intentionally murder these children? Why not induce early birth, if necessary?
I loved the post. I think your thinking is nearly matching the great sukrat’s cocept.