<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="todaycom/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nancy Pelosi Responds To President Bush</title>
	<link>http://conservativepolitics.today.com/2008/07/14/nancy-pelosi-responds-to-president-bush/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://www.today.com/version-2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: stormy</title>
		<link>http://conservativepolitics.today.com/2008/07/14/nancy-pelosi-responds-to-president-bush/#comment-748</link>
		<dc:creator>stormy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://conservativepolitics.today.com/2008/07/14/nancy-pelosi-responds-to-president-bush/#comment-748</guid>
		<description>You know their father. It is a guarantee they will be in the principle's office.  I can only hope it's for calling someone a "beatch."  ROFLMBO!

Just kidding!

Certainly writing what I did goes against the norm, but she really ticked me off.  Lucky for her I can't afford the gas to drive to washington, so that will have to suffice - for now.  

Oh man, I crack myself up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know their father. It is a guarantee they will be in the principle&#8217;s office.  I can only hope it&#8217;s for calling someone a &#8220;beatch.&#8221;  ROFLMBO!</p>
<p>Just kidding!</p>
<p>Certainly writing what I did goes against the norm, but she really ticked me off.  Lucky for her I can&#8217;t afford the gas to drive to washington, so that will have to suffice - for now.  </p>
<p>Oh man, I crack myself up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Shields</title>
		<link>http://conservativepolitics.today.com/2008/07/14/nancy-pelosi-responds-to-president-bush/#comment-741</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Shields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://conservativepolitics.today.com/2008/07/14/nancy-pelosi-responds-to-president-bush/#comment-741</guid>
		<description>Still, would it be oversensitive to point out to you just how self indulgent and unhelpful the following brand of name calling is;

"This over-ripe, prune face, uptight, hypocritical, control -freak, rich beatch is beginning to piss me off. She sits up there on her hand made throne, believing her own thoughts of self-importance."

I was thinking about your comment regarding sensitivity the other day.  Came to a conclusion for which the above passage affords the oppotunity to speak.  This kind of name calling should be left to the school yards.  Then again, I am sure you would not permit it of your children.  If this assumption is correct, why then would you pass off criticism of such behavior as comming from one who is oversensitive?

If my assumption is not correct, what will you tell the principle when one of your children calls one of the girls on the play ground "a beatch".  Because let me tell you, to them it doesn't matter how you spell it.  

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still, would it be oversensitive to point out to you just how self indulgent and unhelpful the following brand of name calling is;</p>
<p>&#8220;This over-ripe, prune face, uptight, hypocritical, control -freak, rich beatch is beginning to piss me off. She sits up there on her hand made throne, believing her own thoughts of self-importance.&#8221;</p>
<p>I was thinking about your comment regarding sensitivity the other day.  Came to a conclusion for which the above passage affords the oppotunity to speak.  This kind of name calling should be left to the school yards.  Then again, I am sure you would not permit it of your children.  If this assumption is correct, why then would you pass off criticism of such behavior as comming from one who is oversensitive?</p>
<p>If my assumption is not correct, what will you tell the principle when one of your children calls one of the girls on the play ground &#8220;a beatch&#8221;.  Because let me tell you, to them it doesn&#8217;t matter how you spell it.  </p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stormy</title>
		<link>http://conservativepolitics.today.com/2008/07/14/nancy-pelosi-responds-to-president-bush/#comment-709</link>
		<dc:creator>stormy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 03:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://conservativepolitics.today.com/2008/07/14/nancy-pelosi-responds-to-president-bush/#comment-709</guid>
		<description>Agree? This is not acceptable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree? This is not acceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Shields</title>
		<link>http://conservativepolitics.today.com/2008/07/14/nancy-pelosi-responds-to-president-bush/#comment-707</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Shields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 02:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://conservativepolitics.today.com/2008/07/14/nancy-pelosi-responds-to-president-bush/#comment-707</guid>
		<description>Alas we agree.  Nancy Pelosi is being an idiot on this one.  Keep you're two week plans, we need a leader with vision that goes out decades.  Oil will and must be part of our energy strategy for decades to come.  Any that we can get get at within our domain must be exploited.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alas we agree.  Nancy Pelosi is being an idiot on this one.  Keep you&#8217;re two week plans, we need a leader with vision that goes out decades.  Oil will and must be part of our energy strategy for decades to come.  Any that we can get get at within our domain must be exploited.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


