Sep 22 2008
Are Obama And Axlerod Responsible For The Palin Smears
The Jawa Report has done a phenomenal job of tracking down the origins of a recent Palin smear video. Rusty Shackleford has once again potentially exposed what could be the next big political scandal.
Extensive research was conducted by the Jawa Report to determine the source of smears directed toward Republican Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin. Those smears included false allegations that she belonged to a secessionist political party and that she has radical anti-American views.
Our research suggests that a subdivision of one of the largest public relations firms in the world most likely started and promulgated rumors about Sarah Palin that were known to be false. These rumors were spread in a surreptitious manner to avoid exposure.
It is also likely that the PR firm was paid by outside sources to run the smear campaign. While not conclusive, evidence suggests a link to the Barack Obama campaign.
For the rest of this hot story, visit Rusty Shackleford atThe Jawa Report.
Rusty Shackleford, you mean, like Dale Gribble’s alias on “King Of The Hill”? Awesome.
From everything that I’ve seen, Youtube has been the biggest culprit for Palin’s ties to the AIP. There is a video of her addressing their 2008 convention. The oldest video I could find of this was posted six months ago.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4iCDBIAde8
Now, earlier today you slammed SNL for a skit that made fun of the NYT for doing exactly what your homeboy at Jawa is doing here. Saying there’s no provable connection, but printing it anyway. Will you delete your earlier post? Maybe you should delete this one…or just refrain from flip-flopping in the span of a few hours. I know, you look to your presidential candidate as a role model, but emulating him all the time is bad for anyone.
The video you link to is in fact her commentary welcoming their convention to the state. The Jawa Report discusses that.
How in the heck you can possibly connect that to sick, twisted “jokes” about incest is beyond me. Certainly you would not accept such a lame defense of jokes about Chicago Obama pimping out his own daughters.
One has nothing to do with the other. But you know that.
The tactics are the same. In a fictional sketch, the actor playing the assignment editor said, and you quote: “The assignment editor for the Times, portrayed by actor James Franco, responded: “He very well could be. Admittedly, there is no evidence of that, but on the other hand, there is no convincing evidence to the contrary. And these are just some of the lingering questions about Governor Palin.”
From your own blog citing Shackleford: “While not conclusive, evidence suggests a link to the Barack Obama campaign.”
Yes, it’s talking about two completely different subjects, but that wasn’t my point. My point is that the methodology is exactly the same. But you knew that.